WebMar 11, 2008 · One of the earliest known court cases about confidentiality was that of Prince Albert v Strange 1849. Queen Victoria and Prince Albert had made some etchings which they had arranged to have printed for private use. When one of the printer’s employees passed these onto a third person, ... Web1849. Jan. 26th, 27th, 29th, & 30th. Feb. 8th.The maker and owner of etchings which have never been exhibited or puhlished, and of which no impressions have heen made except …
Wikizero - Prince Albert v Strange
WebPrince Albert v Strange (1849) Lionel Bently 9. Ramsden v Dyson (1866) Nick Piška 10. Bishop of Natal v Gladstone (1866) Charlotte Smith 11. Earl of Aylesford v Morris (1873) … WebPrince Albert v Strange (1849) 47 ER 1302. This case considered the issue of confidential information and whether or not impressions of etchings of the Prince of England could be … query optimization research papers
The Right to Privacy - Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New …
WebOct 18, 2015 · In Prince Albert v Strange [1849] 1 Mac & G 25, Prince Albert (Queen Victoria’s husband) acquired an injunction to prevent commercial publications of private family etchings which depicted their children and pets. This came about due to the copies being stolen from the printers ... WebPrince Albert v Strange was a court decision made by the High Court of Chancery in 1849, and began the development of confidence law in England. [1] The court awarded Prince Albert an injunction, restraining Strange from publishing a catalogue describing Prince Albert’s etchings.Lord Cottenham LC (Charles Pepys, 1st Earl of Cottenham) noted that … http://www.studentlawnotes.com/prince-albert-v-strange-1849-47-er-1302 shipping lloyds auctions